data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79a94/79a94e6acca11b5967499047c66aa546368b5c43" alt=""
Publication details
Verlag: Springer
Ort: Berlin
Jahr: 2011
Pages: 11-21
Reihe: The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective
ISBN (Hardback): 9789400711792
Volle Referenz:
, "The no miracles intuition and the no miracles argument", in: Explanation, prediction, and confirmation, Berlin, Springer, 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/652c7/652c709c179587882fef7a70c3023c9a5fb759b3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b2d7/8b2d7a29ea4b19606891c77e8b1d6f50d2b31723" alt=""
The no miracles intuition and the no miracles argument
pp. 11-21
in: Dennis Dieks, Stephan Hartmann, Thomas Uebel, Marcel Weber, Wenceslao J. Gonzalez (eds), Explanation, prediction, and confirmation, Berlin, Springer, 2011Abstrakt
In this paper I contrast the very modest view of the main "consideration" supporting scientific realism taken by Poincaré and others with the much more ambitious argument developed by Stathis Psillos using some ideas of Hilary Putnam's and of Richard Boyd's. I argue that the attempt to produce a more ambitious argument not only fails, but was always bound to fail.
Cited authors
Publication details
Verlag: Springer
Ort: Berlin
Jahr: 2011
Pages: 11-21
Reihe: The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective
ISBN (Hardback): 9789400711792
Volle Referenz:
, "The no miracles intuition and the no miracles argument", in: Explanation, prediction, and confirmation, Berlin, Springer, 2011