data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79a94/79a94e6acca11b5967499047c66aa546368b5c43" alt=""
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2011
Pages: 23-35
Series: The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective
ISBN (Hardback): 9789400711792
Full citation:
, "The scope and limits of the no miracles argument1", in: Explanation, prediction, and confirmation, Berlin, Springer, 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/652c7/652c709c179587882fef7a70c3023c9a5fb759b3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b2d7/8b2d7a29ea4b19606891c77e8b1d6f50d2b31723" alt=""
The scope and limits of the no miracles argument1
pp. 23-35
in: Dennis Dieks, Stephan Hartmann, Thomas Uebel, Marcel Weber, Wenceslao J. Gonzalez (eds), Explanation, prediction, and confirmation, Berlin, Springer, 2011Abstract
In this paper, I review the scope and limits of the no miracles argument. I defend and, where necessary, revise my account of it as a way to justify Inference to the Best Explanation (IBE).
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2011
Pages: 23-35
Series: The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective
ISBN (Hardback): 9789400711792
Full citation:
, "The scope and limits of the no miracles argument1", in: Explanation, prediction, and confirmation, Berlin, Springer, 2011