data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79a94/79a94e6acca11b5967499047c66aa546368b5c43" alt=""
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2019
Pages: 275-285
Series: Husserl Studies
Full citation:
, "Doyon, Maxime and Thiemo Breyer (eds.), Normativity in perception" Husserl Studies 35 (3), 2019, pp. 275-285
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/652c7/652c709c179587882fef7a70c3023c9a5fb759b3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b2d7/8b2d7a29ea4b19606891c77e8b1d6f50d2b31723" alt=""
Doyon, Maxime and Thiemo Breyer (eds.), Normativity in perception
pp. 275-285
in: Husserl Studies 35 (3), 2019.Abstract
Even a cursory survey of publication trends in philosophy from the last decade would indicate that “normativity” (and its cognates) has become a buzzword. As far as buzzwords go, this one is especially peculiar, since it is not at all obvious, even to philosophers, what this word is supposed to mean in the various contexts it has come to occupy. Fortunately, this outstanding collection of essays edited by Maxime Doyon and Thiemo Breyer addresses this problem in detail. Normativity in Perceptionappears in Palgrave MacMillan’s “New Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science” series, whose stated goal is to foster a “growing interest in rethinking traditional philosophical notions of cognition” through open dialogue with phenomenology, dynamic systems theory, and approaches which aim “to rethink cognition as the direction of the action of an embodied and affectively attuned organism embedded in its social world” (p. i). Doyon and Breyer’s volume wonderfully succeeds in meeting this...
Cited authors
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2019
Pages: 275-285
Series: Husserl Studies
Full citation:
, "Doyon, Maxime and Thiemo Breyer (eds.), Normativity in perception" Husserl Studies 35 (3), 2019, pp. 275-285