data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79a94/79a94e6acca11b5967499047c66aa546368b5c43" alt=""
Publication details
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan
Place: Basingstoke
Year: 2015
Pages: 159-177
Series: Radical Theologies
ISBN (Hardback): 9781349677672
Full citation:
, "Changing ontotheology", in: Retrieving the radical Tillich, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/652c7/652c709c179587882fef7a70c3023c9a5fb759b3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b2d7/8b2d7a29ea4b19606891c77e8b1d6f50d2b31723" alt=""
Changing ontotheology
Paul Tillich, Catherine Malabou, and the plastic God
pp. 159-177
in: Retrieving the radical Tillich, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015Abstract
By his identification of God with being-itself Paul Tillich is an ontotheologian par excellence. As Charles Winquist affirms: "Tillich is not a postmodern theologian. He clearly works within the ontotheological tradition."1 Indeed, Tillich may be seen as the last unabashed ontotheologian. While this relatively straightforward claim has been contested by many leading scholars of Tillich, it will be my argument that the radical Tillich is the ontotheological Tillich.2
Cited authors
Publication details
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan
Place: Basingstoke
Year: 2015
Pages: 159-177
Series: Radical Theologies
ISBN (Hardback): 9781349677672
Full citation:
, "Changing ontotheology", in: Retrieving the radical Tillich, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015