karl bühler digital

Home > Edited Book > Contribution

Publication details

Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan

Place: Basingstoke

Year: 2013

Pages: 109-125

ISBN (Hardback): 9781349457168

Full citation:

Enio Passiani, "Past and present in sociological theory", in: Norbert Elias and social theory, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013

Past and present in sociological theory

some similarities and differences between Émile Durkheim and Norbert Elias

Enio Passiani

pp. 109-125

in: François Dépelteau, Tatiana Savoia Landini (eds), Norbert Elias and social theory, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013

Abstract

Posing a possible theoretical affinity between Émile Durkheim and Norbert Elias is not new. Other authors have pointed to such a relationship (Ferreira 2010; Zabludovsky 2007; Coury 2001; Lahire 2001), while not excluding differences, of course. In general, the most marked similarity noted in the sociological literature—except for Lahire's approach, which poses affinity from a different angle—has to do with processes of self-control that life in society enables individuals to develop and even demands of them.2 Taking quite different paths, both Durkheim and Elias reach very similar conclusions.3

Cited authors

Publication details

Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan

Place: Basingstoke

Year: 2013

Pages: 109-125

ISBN (Hardback): 9781349457168

Full citation:

Enio Passiani, "Past and present in sociological theory", in: Norbert Elias and social theory, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013