data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79a94/79a94e6acca11b5967499047c66aa546368b5c43" alt=""
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2017
Pages: 127-140
Series: The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science
ISBN (Hardback): 9783319527666
Full citation:
, "Long-term potentiation", in: Eppur si muove, Berlin, Springer, 2017
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/652c7/652c709c179587882fef7a70c3023c9a5fb759b3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b2d7/8b2d7a29ea4b19606891c77e8b1d6f50d2b31723" alt=""
Long-term potentiation
one kind or many?
pp. 127-140
in: Marcus P. Adams, Zvi Biener, Uljana Feest, Jacqueline A. Sullivan (eds), Eppur si muove, Berlin, Springer, 2017Abstract
Do neurobiologists aim to discover natural kinds? I address this question in this chapter via a critical analysis of classification practices operative across the 43-year history of research on long-term potentiation (LTP). I suggest that this 43-year history supports the idea that the structure of scientific practice surrounding LTP research has remained an obstacle to the discovery of natural kinds as philosophers of science have traditionally conceived them.
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2017
Pages: 127-140
Series: The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science
ISBN (Hardback): 9783319527666
Full citation:
, "Long-term potentiation", in: Eppur si muove, Berlin, Springer, 2017