![](/public/assets/img/publi/_default/cover.jpg)
Publication details
Jahr: 2014
Reihe: European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy
Volle Referenz:
, "Linguistic pragmatism and cultural naturalism", European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 6 (2), 2014.
![](/public/assets/img/bookmark.png)
![](/public/assets/img/rights/COPR.png)
Linguistic pragmatism and cultural naturalism
noncognitive experience, culture, and the human eros
in: Language or experience, European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 6 (2), 2014.
Abstrakt
Contrary to some recent self-styled “linguistic pragmatists” who seek to dispense with the purportedly obsolete term “experience”. this essay attempts to show that pragmatism cannot cogently dispense with experience, understanding that term in its Deweyan sense as “culture” and not some sort of mentalistic perception or state. Focusing on Robert Brandom’s recent Perspectives on Pragmatism, I show how the very assumptions that Dewey meant to call into question with his “instrumentalist turn” in 1903 are enshrined in Brandom’s “new and improved” form of pragmatism. Judged in terms of its pragmatic consequences, Brandom’s linguistic pragmatism returns to the well trodden paths and problems of analytic philosophy and not the radical approach that Dewey’s “cultural naturalism” (Dewey’s name for his philosophy) offers. The fundamental issue is not, I contend, between types of pragmatism at all but between conceptions of human nature and what a human life is. John Stuart Mill once said of Bentham that, for an empiricist, he had really very little experience, especially of human nature. I am afraid that the same judgment here is passed on those wishing to dispense with experience and somehow retain pragmatism.
Cited authors
Publication details
Jahr: 2014
Reihe: European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy
Volle Referenz:
, "Linguistic pragmatism and cultural naturalism", European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 6 (2), 2014.