
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2007
Pages: 89-98
Series: Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences
Full citation:
, "Subjectivity in heterophenomenology", Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences 6, 2007, pp. 89-98.
Abstract
I distinguish between naïve phenomenology and really existing phenomenology, a distinction that is too often ignored. As a consequence, the weaknesses inherent in naïve phenomenology are mistakenly attributed to phenomenology. I argue that the critics of naïve phenomenology have unwittingly adopted a number of precisely those weaknesses they wish to point out. More precisely, I shall argue that Dennett's criticism of the naïve or auto-phenomenological conception of subjectivity fails to provide a better understanding of the intended phenomenon.
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2007
Pages: 89-98
Series: Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences
Full citation:
, "Subjectivity in heterophenomenology", Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences 6, 2007, pp. 89-98.