data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79a94/79a94e6acca11b5967499047c66aa546368b5c43" alt=""
Publication details
Jahr: 2010
Pages: 345-359
Reihe: Synthese
Volle Referenz:
, "Concrete possible worlds and counterfactual conditionals", Synthese 176 (3), 2010, pp. 345-359.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/652c7/652c709c179587882fef7a70c3023c9a5fb759b3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b2d7/8b2d7a29ea4b19606891c77e8b1d6f50d2b31723" alt=""
Concrete possible worlds and counterfactual conditionals
Lewis versus Williamson on modal knowledge
pp. 345-359
in: Synthese 176 (3), 2010.Abstrakt
The epistemology of modality is gradually coming to play a central role in general discussions about modality. This paper is a contribution in this direction, in particular I draw a comparison between Lewis’s Modal realism and Timothy Williamson’s recent account of modality in terms of counterfactual thinking. In order to have criteria of evaluation, I also formulate four requirements which are supposed to be met by any theory of modality to be epistemologically adequate.
Cited authors
Publication details
Jahr: 2010
Pages: 345-359
Reihe: Synthese
Volle Referenz:
, "Concrete possible worlds and counterfactual conditionals", Synthese 176 (3), 2010, pp. 345-359.