data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79a94/79a94e6acca11b5967499047c66aa546368b5c43" alt=""
Publication details
Jahr: 2017
Pages: 1565-1590
Reihe: Synthese
Volle Referenz:
, "Why follow the royal rule?", Synthese 194 (5), 2017, pp. 1565-1590.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/652c7/652c709c179587882fef7a70c3023c9a5fb759b3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b2d7/8b2d7a29ea4b19606891c77e8b1d6f50d2b31723" alt=""
Why follow the royal rule?
pp. 1565-1590
in: Julien Dutant, Davide Fassio, Anne Meylan (eds), Truth & epistemic norms, Synthese 194 (5), 2017.Abstrakt
This note is a sequel to Huber (Synthese 191:2167–2193, 2014). It is shown that obeying a normative principle relating counterfactual conditionals and conditional beliefs, viz. the royal rule, is a necessary and sufficient means to attaining a cognitive end that relates true beliefs in purely factual, non-modal propositions and true beliefs in purely modal propositions. Along the way I will sketch my idealism about alethic or metaphysical modality.
Publication details
Jahr: 2017
Pages: 1565-1590
Reihe: Synthese
Volle Referenz:
, "Why follow the royal rule?", Synthese 194 (5), 2017, pp. 1565-1590.