
Publication details
Publisher: Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego
Place: Gdansk
Year: 2019
Pages: 178-195
Series: Miscellanea Anthropologica et Sociologica
Full citation:
, "Praxis, the body, and solidarity", Miscellanea Anthropologica et Sociologica 20 (1), 2019, pp. 178-195.


Praxis, the body, and solidarity
some reflections on the Marxist readings of phenomenology in Poland (1945-1989)
pp. 178-195
in: Witold Płotka (ed), Phenomenology, practice, and action, Miscellanea Anthropologica et Sociologica 20 (1), 2019.Abstract
The article presents main tendencies in the reception of phenomenology in the light of Marxism in Poland in the post-war period. As it is argued, although phenomenology was marginalized and even refused from the Marxist position, a dialogue between both traditions established interesting developments, especially with regard to the problem of the body, and constitution of solidarity as a social phenomenon. The main thesis of the study is that the confrontation with Marxism enabled phenomenologists a problematization of the phenomenon of work as a specific way of being. The article is divided into three parts. First, the author defines main ideological points of the Marxist critique of phenomenology, i.e., a critique of phenomenology as a bourgeois philosophy that cannot offer anything to the communist society since it abandons the sphere of praxis. Next, positive developments of the phenomenological method are to be reconstructed; moreover, the author analyzes Szewczyk’s original reading of Husserl, and his analysis of experience of the body. Finally, the article points out a Marxist background of some thoughts of Wojtyła and Tischner, including Tischner’s ethics of solidarity, and Wojtyła’s emphasis on human dignity.
Cited authors
Publication details
Publisher: Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego
Place: Gdansk
Year: 2019
Pages: 178-195
Series: Miscellanea Anthropologica et Sociologica
Full citation:
, "Praxis, the body, and solidarity", Miscellanea Anthropologica et Sociologica 20 (1), 2019, pp. 178-195.