data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79a94/79a94e6acca11b5967499047c66aa546368b5c43" alt=""
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2015
Pages: 147-163
Series: Law and Philosophy Library
ISBN (Hardback): 9783319093741
Full citation:
, "Obligation", in: Problems of normativity, rules and rule-following, Berlin, Springer, 2015
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/652c7/652c709c179587882fef7a70c3023c9a5fb759b3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b2d7/8b2d7a29ea4b19606891c77e8b1d6f50d2b31723" alt=""
Obligation
a legal-theoretical perspective
pp. 147-163
in: Michał Araszkiewicz, Paweł Banaś, Tomasz Gizbert-Studnicki, Krzysztof Płeszka (eds), Problems of normativity, rules and rule-following, Berlin, Springer, 2015Abstract
In this study, I intend to contribute to a better understanding of what kind of thing an obligation is and what its defining features are. Central to the conception I will put forward is the idea of obligation as having two essential aspects: one of these lies in the internal connection of obligation with moral practical reasons and is accordingly rational and moral; the other one instead lies in the conceptual link between obligation and requiredness, or mandatory force. In combination these two aspects, which interlock to form what I would call the duality of obligation, frame obligation as a rational and morally justifiable categorical requirement.
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2015
Pages: 147-163
Series: Law and Philosophy Library
ISBN (Hardback): 9783319093741
Full citation:
, "Obligation", in: Problems of normativity, rules and rule-following, Berlin, Springer, 2015