karl bühler digital

Home > Book Series > Edited Book > Contribution

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 2014

Pages: 269-292

Series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy

ISBN (Hardback): 9783319015408

Full citation:

Doris Gerland, "Definitely not possessed?", in: Frames and concept types, Berlin, Springer, 2014

Abstract

In this paper I argue that the definiteness marking function of the possessive suffix of some Uralic languages is not the outcome of a grammaticalization pathway but has always been inherent to them. The possessive suffix has thus two main functions: establishing a relation between entities or a relation between an entity and the discourse and indicating the definiteness of the referent of the marked noun. The interpretation of the suffix as a marker of definiteness or a marker of possession depends on the conceptual noun type of the marked noun and on the context.

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 2014

Pages: 269-292

Series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy

ISBN (Hardback): 9783319015408

Full citation:

Doris Gerland, "Definitely not possessed?", in: Frames and concept types, Berlin, Springer, 2014