
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2003
Pages: 213-220
Series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science
ISBN (Hardback): 9789048162345
Full citation:
, "Science, politics and objectivity", in: Science and culture, Berlin, Springer, 2003
Abstract
The equation of the idea of objectivity with that of scientific objectivity is popular. Thus, what we deem not fully objective we demote to the status of non-science. Objectivity thus prescribes unanimity. All should agree about it except for those whom we disregard: the ignorant, the vicious, or those who are otherwise at fault. Hence, if scientific politics is possible, it should prescribe unanimity among all who count. Otherwise, we should deem subjective all politics, especially party-politics. And then, the decision regarding party affiliation becomes a matter of mere taste. All this seems to be a clear-cut conclusion from the equation of science with objectivity. This equation rules out both rationality and pluralism, and, finally, democracy too. It is shaky, then, to say the least.
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2003
Pages: 213-220
Series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science
ISBN (Hardback): 9789048162345
Full citation:
, "Science, politics and objectivity", in: Science and culture, Berlin, Springer, 2003