karl bühler digital

Home > Proceedings > Contribution

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 1999

Pages: 227-246

ISBN (Hardback): 9789048152575

Full citation:

Michael Stöltzner, "To what extent does formal teleology still make sense?", in: Hermeneutics and science, Berlin, Springer, 1999

To what extent does formal teleology still make sense?

Michael Stöltzner

pp. 227-246

in: Olga Kiss (ed), Hermeneutics and science, Berlin, Springer, 1999

Abstract

Whether teleological analysis is at all useful seems to hinge upon the topic considered. Nobody doubts that human actions can be described teleologically because human agents want to achieve goals. In biology, however, the issue was thought to be so tightly connected to the reductionism-vitalism debate that a new terminology was introduced to describe the fact that DNA is a program for natural processes. Within physics, there even exists a rather general agreement that teleological notions are fruitless if not noxious. This is deeply rooted in the exaggerated debates on physicotheology during the first half of the 18th century. The battles waged then seem quite ridiculous to us today. Nevertheless, those few discussing teleology in physics today do not refrain from emphasizing its possible theological implications [BT].

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 1999

Pages: 227-246

ISBN (Hardback): 9789048152575

Full citation:

Michael Stöltzner, "To what extent does formal teleology still make sense?", in: Hermeneutics and science, Berlin, Springer, 1999