data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79a94/79a94e6acca11b5967499047c66aa546368b5c43" alt=""
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 1998
Pages: 19-33
Series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science
ISBN (Hardback): 9789048148592
Full citation:
, "Whose nature? which morality?", in: Philosophies of nature: the human dimension, Berlin, Springer, 1998
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/652c7/652c709c179587882fef7a70c3023c9a5fb759b3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b2d7/8b2d7a29ea4b19606891c77e8b1d6f50d2b31723" alt=""
Whose nature? which morality?
on Kohák's moral sense of nature
pp. 19-33
in: Robert S. Cohen, Alfred Tauber (eds), Philosophies of nature: the human dimension, Berlin, Springer, 1998Abstract
Blind to good and evil, reckless of destruction, omnipotent matter rolls on its relentless way; for Man, condemned to-day to lose his dearest, to-morrow himself to pass through the gate of darkness, it remains only to cherish, ere yet the blow falls, the lofty thoughts that ennoble his little day... proudly defiant of the irresistable forces that tolerate, for a moment, his knowledge and his condemnation, to sustain alone, a weary but unyielding Atlas, the world that his own ideals have fashioned despite the trampling march of unconscious power. (Russell, p. 47)
Cited authors
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 1998
Pages: 19-33
Series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science
ISBN (Hardback): 9789048148592
Full citation:
, "Whose nature? which morality?", in: Philosophies of nature: the human dimension, Berlin, Springer, 1998