Husserl's mereological argument for intentional constitution

Agustin Serrano De Haro

pp. 661-678

in: Carlo Ierna, Hanne Jacobs, Filip Mattens (eds), Philosophy, phenomenology, sciences, Berlin, Springer, 2010

Abstract

In this paper I will attempt to defend the position that there is an ontology proper and peculiar to transcendental phenomenology, and that from this ontological point of view it is possible to understand better Husserl'sinsistence that transcendental phenomenology is a well-founded philosophy meeting the requirements of a strict science. I am fully aware that such an approach must face a large number of hermeneutical and theoretical problems.

Cited authors

Husserl Edmund