data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79a94/79a94e6acca11b5967499047c66aa546368b5c43" alt=""
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2014
Pages: 195-216
Series: Continental Philosophy Review
Full citation:
, "Despair and the determinate negation of Brandom's Hegel", Continental Philosophy Review 47 (2), 2014, pp. 195-216.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/652c7/652c709c179587882fef7a70c3023c9a5fb759b3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b2d7/8b2d7a29ea4b19606891c77e8b1d6f50d2b31723" alt=""
Despair and the determinate negation of Brandom's Hegel
pp. 195-216
in: Continental Philosophy Review 47 (2), 2014.Abstract
In this paper, I contend that Brandom's interpretive oversights leave his inferentialist program vulnerable to Hegelian critique. My target is Brandom's notion of "conceptual realism," or the thesis that the structure of mind-independent reality mimics the structure of thought. I show, first, that the conceptual realism at the heart of Brandom's empiricism finds root in his interpretation of Hegel. I then argue that conceptual realism is incompatible with Hegel's thought, since the Jena Phenomenology, understood as a "way of despair," includes a critique of the philosophical framework upon which conceptual realism relies. Finally, I offer the Hegelian critique of Brandom that results from these textual infidelities.
Cited authors
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2014
Pages: 195-216
Series: Continental Philosophy Review
Full citation:
, "Despair and the determinate negation of Brandom's Hegel", Continental Philosophy Review 47 (2), 2014, pp. 195-216.