karl bühler digital

Home > Journal > Journal Issue > Journal article

Publication details

Year: 1989

Pages: 271-282

Series: Synthese

Full citation:

Nancy Cartwright, "The Born-Einstein debate", Synthese 81 (3), 1989, pp. 271-282.

The Born-Einstein debate

where application and explanation separate

Nancy Cartwright

pp. 271-282

in: Synthese 81 (3), 1989.

Abstract

Application in science has its own structure, distinct from the structure of theoretical science, and therefore needs its own philosophy. The covering power of a formal scientific theory is no guide to its explanatory power. Explanation is too much to ask of a fundamental scientific theory. This is seen by considering two strands of the Born-Einstein debate: first the explanatory power of quantum mechanics and second, the reality of unobserved properties. The function of theoretical physics is to describe rather than to explain. Some techniques are a standard part of theory; while some aread hoc to the problems at hand. Very few of the derivations in mathematical physics are explanatory. This shows distinctly separate structures for theory and for application.

Publication details

Year: 1989

Pages: 271-282

Series: Synthese

Full citation:

Nancy Cartwright, "The Born-Einstein debate", Synthese 81 (3), 1989, pp. 271-282.