karl bühler digital

Home > Journal > Journal Issue > Journal article

Publication details

Year: 1995

Pages: 87-114

Series: Synthese

Full citation:

Jim Garrison, "Dewey's philosophy and the experience of working", Synthese 105 (1), 1995, pp. 87-114.

Dewey's philosophy and the experience of working

labor, tools and language

Jim Garrison

pp. 87-114

in: Synthese 105 (1), 1995.

Abstract

Although Richard Rorty has done much to renew interest in the philosophy of John Dewey, he nonetheless rejects two of the most important components of Dewey's philosophy, that is, his metaphysics and epistemology. Following George Santayana, Rorty accuses Dewey of trying to serve Locke and Hegel, an impossibility as Rorty rightly sees it. Rorty (1982) says that Dewey should have been “Hegelian all the way” (p. 85). By reconstructing a bit of Hegel's early philosophy of work, and comparing it to Dewey's metaphysics and epistemology we can see that Dewey was indeed “Hegelian all the way” and that Rorty has constructed a false dilemma. We also gain some interesting insight into Dewey's philosophy by viewing it in terms of labor, tools and language.

Cited authors

Publication details

Year: 1995

Pages: 87-114

Series: Synthese

Full citation:

Jim Garrison, "Dewey's philosophy and the experience of working", Synthese 105 (1), 1995, pp. 87-114.