karl bühler digital

Home > Journal > Journal Issue > Journal article

Publication details

Year: 1999

Pages: 213-228

Series: Synthese

Full citation:

James D. McCawley, "Unconfirmed sightings of an "ordinary language" theory of language", Synthese 120 (2), 1999, pp. 213-228.

Unconfirmed sightings of an "ordinary language" theory of language

James D. McCawley

pp. 213-228

in: Synthese 120 (2), 1999.

Abstract

It is unfortunate that Francis Y. Lin, in ‘Chomsky on the “ordinary language” view of language’ pays little attention to his own remark, ‘Chomsky’s criticisms make us realize that we should not be content with general and vague formulations of convention, ability, and so on. We must make such notions precise and provide details’ Lin speaks so imprecisely and provides so few details of notions on which he relies heavily, such as ‘general learning mechanism’ and ‘sentence frame’, that readers must employ large amounts of guesswork to place even a halfway specific interpretation on his proposals and claims.

Cited authors

Publication details

Year: 1999

Pages: 213-228

Series: Synthese

Full citation:

James D. McCawley, "Unconfirmed sightings of an "ordinary language" theory of language", Synthese 120 (2), 1999, pp. 213-228.