karl bühler digital

Home > Journal > Journal Issue > Journal article

Publication details

Year: 2009

Pages: 377-386

Series: Synthese

Full citation:

Jesper Kallestrup, "Conceivability, rigidity and counterpossibles", Synthese 171 (3), 2009, pp. 377-386.

Abstract

Wright (In Gendler and Hawthorne (Eds.), Conceivability and possibility, 2002) rejects some dominant responses to Kripke’s modal argument against the mind-body identity theory, and instead he proposes a new response that draws on a certain understanding of counterpossibles. This paper offers some defensive remarks on behalf of Lewis’ objection to that argument, and it argues that Wright’s proposal fails to fully accommodate the conceivability intuitions, and that it is dialectically ineffective.

Cited authors

Publication details

Year: 2009

Pages: 377-386

Series: Synthese

Full citation:

Jesper Kallestrup, "Conceivability, rigidity and counterpossibles", Synthese 171 (3), 2009, pp. 377-386.