data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79a94/79a94e6acca11b5967499047c66aa546368b5c43" alt=""
Publication details
Year: 2011
Pages: 271-284
Series: Synthese
Full citation:
, "E. W. Beth as a philosopher of physics", Synthese 179 (2), 2011, pp. 271-284.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/652c7/652c709c179587882fef7a70c3023c9a5fb759b3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b2d7/8b2d7a29ea4b19606891c77e8b1d6f50d2b31723" alt=""
E. W. Beth as a philosopher of physics
pp. 271-284
in: Johan van Benthem, Theo A. Kuipers, Henk Visser (eds), Logic and philosophy of science in the footsteps of E. W. Beth, Synthese 179 (2), 2011.Abstract
This paper examines E. W. Beth’s work in the philosophy of physics, both from a historical and a systematic point of view. Beth saw the philosophy of physics first of all as an opportunity to illustrate and promulgate a new and modern general approach to the philosophy of nature and to philosophy tout court: an approach characterized negatively by its rejection of all traditional metaphysics and positively by its firm orientation towards science. Beth was successful in defending this new ideology, and became its leading Dutch representative in the first two decades after the second world war. Beth also contributed importantly to the method of the philosophy of physics in a narrower sense, by proposing and promoting the semantic approach in the formal analysis of physical theories. Finally, he worked on several specific foundational questions; but he was probably too much of a logician to leave his mark in this area.
Cited authors
Publication details
Year: 2011
Pages: 271-284
Series: Synthese
Full citation:
, "E. W. Beth as a philosopher of physics", Synthese 179 (2), 2011, pp. 271-284.