data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79a94/79a94e6acca11b5967499047c66aa546368b5c43" alt=""
Publication details
Year: 2017
Pages: 593-607
Series: Synthese
Full citation:
, "Knowledge how, ability, and the type-token distinction", Synthese 194 (2), 2017, pp. 593-607.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/652c7/652c709c179587882fef7a70c3023c9a5fb759b3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b2d7/8b2d7a29ea4b19606891c77e8b1d6f50d2b31723" alt=""
Knowledge how, ability, and the type-token distinction
pp. 593-607
in: Richard Dawid (ed), A philosophical look at the discovery of the Higgs boson, Synthese 194 (2), 2017.Abstract
This paper examines the relationship between knowing how to G and the ability to G, which is typically presented in one of the following ways: (a) knowing how to G entails the ability to G; (b) knowing how to G does not entail the ability to G. In an attempt to reconcile these two putatively opposing positions, I distinguish between type and token actions. It is my contention that S can know how to G in the absence of an ability to (hbox {G}_{mathrm{token}}), where this action is derived from an action-type, but not in the absence of the ability to perform the action-type itself ((hbox {G}_{mathrm{type}})). This refinement is an attempt to reconcile differences between intellectualism and anti-intellectualism (broadly construed) with regard to knowledge how and ability.
Publication details
Year: 2017
Pages: 593-607
Series: Synthese
Full citation:
, "Knowledge how, ability, and the type-token distinction", Synthese 194 (2), 2017, pp. 593-607.