data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79a94/79a94e6acca11b5967499047c66aa546368b5c43" alt=""
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 1986
Pages: 197-211
Series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science
ISBN (Hardback): 9789401088947
Full citation:
, "On the limits of symbolic interpretation in anthropology", in: Thinking about society, Berlin, Springer, 1986
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/652c7/652c709c179587882fef7a70c3023c9a5fb759b3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b2d7/8b2d7a29ea4b19606891c77e8b1d6f50d2b31723" alt=""
On the limits of symbolic interpretation in anthropology
pp. 197-211
in: , Thinking about society, Berlin, Springer, 1986Abstract
An ethnographer observes a man killing a sheep by cutting its throat. A bystander, when asked what is going on, replies: “He is making an offering to the ancestors”. What is the logical status of such a statement? What does it “mean” apart from its standing as a description of the sacrificer’s actions? How does it come to mean what it means? Does it always mean the same thing? These are issues of great complexity and, for anthropologists anyway, of great importance. Does it always mean the same thing? These are issues of great complexity and, for anthropologists anyway, of great importance.
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 1986
Pages: 197-211
Series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science
ISBN (Hardback): 9789401088947
Full citation:
, "On the limits of symbolic interpretation in anthropology", in: Thinking about society, Berlin, Springer, 1986