data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79a94/79a94e6acca11b5967499047c66aa546368b5c43" alt=""
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 1986
Pages: 95-106
Series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science
ISBN (Hardback): 9789401088947
Full citation:
, "The emergence of social anthropology from philosophy", in: Thinking about society, Berlin, Springer, 1986
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/652c7/652c709c179587882fef7a70c3023c9a5fb759b3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b2d7/8b2d7a29ea4b19606891c77e8b1d6f50d2b31723" alt=""
The emergence of social anthropology from philosophy
pp. 95-106
in: , Thinking about society, Berlin, Springer, 1986Abstract
In a way, almost every 'subject-matter" now taught in the groves of academe has "emerged" from philosophy, if only because the Greek notion of philosophy was comprehensive. However, when Aristotle came to summarize the knowledge of the Greek world he wrote a Politics but did not write a Sociology or an Anthropology. This is puzzling, as it is not hard to show that his teacher Plato was a very sophisticated sociological thinker.1 This being the case, should sociology and social anthropology be dated from Plato, or even from Herodotus? All such questions are an elaborate form of game—with rules, outcomes and pay-offs to suit the players. It certainly seems to me a preferable game to that in which the antecedents of sociology are traced to Comte because he coined the word.
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 1986
Pages: 95-106
Series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science
ISBN (Hardback): 9789401088947
Full citation:
, "The emergence of social anthropology from philosophy", in: Thinking about society, Berlin, Springer, 1986