
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 1989
Pages: 369-390
Series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science
ISBN (Hardback): 9789401075466
Full citation:
, "Reduction without reductionism?", in: An intimate relation, Berlin, Springer, 1989


Reduction without reductionism?
pp. 369-390
in: James BROWN, Jürgen Mittelstrass (eds), An intimate relation, Berlin, Springer, 1989Abstract
It is a time-honored piece of theoretical speculation that nature is a kosmos, i.e. an ordered, perhaps even purposeful whole. Kant may be taken as a typical exponent of this view under conditions of modern science: he defines nature in the material sense as the total set of potential contents of our experiences and, at the same time, attempts to show that this set is subject to pervasive laws which express nature in the formal sense of the term, i.e. the internal unitary principle (or set of principles) underlying the existence of the experiential world (Kant 1781/87, A 216/B 263; 1785, §§15–16; 1786, Preface).
Cited authors
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 1989
Pages: 369-390
Series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science
ISBN (Hardback): 9789401075466
Full citation:
, "Reduction without reductionism?", in: An intimate relation, Berlin, Springer, 1989