karl bühler digital

Home > Journal > Journal Issue > Journal article

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 2015

Pages: 225-239

Series: Philosophy & Technology

Full citation:

Mario Villalobos, David Ward, "Living systems", Philosophy & Technology 28 (2), 2015, pp. 225-239.

Living systems

autonomy, autopoiesis and enaction

Mario Villalobos

David Ward

pp. 225-239

in: Philosophy & Technology 28 (2), 2015.

Abstract

The autopoietic theory and the enactive approach are two theoretical streams that, in spite of their historical link and conceptual affinities, offer very different views on the nature of living beings. In this paper, we compare these views and evaluate, in an exploratory way, their respective degrees of internal coherence. Focusing the analyses on certain key notions such as autonomy and organizational closure, we argue that while the autopoietic theory manages to elaborate an internally consistent conception of living beings, the enactive approach presents an internal tension regarding its characterization of living beings as intentional systems directed at the environment.

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 2015

Pages: 225-239

Series: Philosophy & Technology

Full citation:

Mario Villalobos, David Ward, "Living systems", Philosophy & Technology 28 (2), 2015, pp. 225-239.