Semantic holism is here to stay

Johannes L. Brandl

1-16

A critique of the case for semantic holism

Michael Devitt

17-60

The unavailability of what we mean

a reply to Quine, Fodor and Lepore

Georges Rey

61-101

Intentional chemistry

Joseph Levine

103-134

Conceptual connection and the observation/theory distinction

Louise Anthony

135-161

Meaning holism defended

Gilbert Harman

163-171

Is content holism incoherent?

Kirk A. Ludwig

173-195

The impossibility of punctate mental representations

Anne Bezuidenhout

197-212

The cost of meaning solipsism

Takashi Yagisawa

213-230

Holism

the polarized spectrum

Alberto Peruzzi

231-282

Inferential roles, Quine, and mad holism

Jonathan Berg

283-301

Replies

Jerry Fodor, Ernest LePore

303-322