Introduction

Lena Soler

1-17

Incommensurability naturalized

Alexander Bird

21-39

Commentary on Bird's paper

Paul Hoyningen-Huene

41-46

Nonsense and paradigm change

Aristides Baltas

49-70

Commentary on "nonsense and paradigm change", by Aristides Baltas

Eric Oberheim

71-83

From one version to the other

intra-theoretical change

Anouk Barberousse

87-101

Commentary on "from one version to the other

intra-theoretical change", by Anouk Barberousse

Igor Ly

103-105

Modeling high-temperature superconductivity

correspondence at bay?

Stephan Hartmann

109-129

An instrumental bayesianism meets the history of science

Edward Jurkowitz

131-141

Commentary on "is science cumulative? a physicist viewpoint", by Bernard d'Espagnat

Marcel Weber

153-156

The optimistic meta-induction and ontological continuity

the case of the electron

Robert Nola

159-202

Some optimism for the pessimist

Steve Clarke

203-206

Can we consider quantum mechanics to be a description of reality?

Hervé Zwirn

209-217

Commentary on "can we consider quantum mechanics to be a description of reality?", by Hervé Zwirn

Soazig Le Bihan

219-222

Reasons for choosing among readings of equipollent theories

Rom Harré

225-238

Harré needs no realism

Mauricio Suárez

239-243

Of course idealizations are incommensurable!

Paul Teller

247-264

Incommensurability from a modelling perspective

Ronald N. Giere

265-269

The aim and structure of methodological theory

Martin Carrier

273-290

Method and objectivity

Michel Bitbol

291-296

The incommensurability of experimental practices

an incommensurability of what? an incommensurability of a third type?

Lena Soler

299-339

Some reflections on experimental incommensurability

Howard Sankey

341-347

Disruptive scientific change

Thomas Nickles

351-379

Scientific revolutions

the view from inside and the view from outside

Emiliano Trizio

381-384