karl bühler digital

Home > Book Series > Edited Book > Contribution

Publication details

Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan

Place: Basingstoke

Year: 2019

Pages: 97-124

Series: Political Philosophy and Public Purpose

ISBN (Hardback): 9783319919799

Full citation:

David A. Borman, "Bourgeois illusions", in: Axel Honneth and the critical theory of recognition, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2019

Abstract

Axel Honneth—and sympathetic critics on his behalf – have argued that his mature work can be understood as "the attempt to provide a consistent theoretical model to extend" the insights of critical historians and sociologists, like E.P. Thompson and Barrington Moore, Jr., whose work formed an important point of departure for Honneth's early research. This chapter attempts to demonstrate the contrary: that Honneth's middle and most recent writings represents an abandonment of the basic convictions of his own earlier work, which was indeed consonant with Thompson, Moore, and others and which, partly for that reason, held considerable promise.

Cited authors

Publication details

Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan

Place: Basingstoke

Year: 2019

Pages: 97-124

Series: Political Philosophy and Public Purpose

ISBN (Hardback): 9783319919799

Full citation:

David A. Borman, "Bourgeois illusions", in: Axel Honneth and the critical theory of recognition, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2019