Epistemic and semantic reflections on scientific realism
pp. 97-101
in: Edna Ullmann-Margalit (ed), Science in reflection, Berlin, Springer, 1988Abstrakt
Of the three points made by L.J. Cohen, I shall consider two: his refutation of irrealism and his argument that van Fraassen's version of irrealism is subject to the same difficulties van Fraassen has found with realism.