Saving proof from paradox

Gödel's paradox and the inconsistency of informal mathematics

Fenner Stanley Tanswell

pp. 159-173

in: Holger Andreas, Peter Verdée (eds), Logical studies of paraconsistent reasoning in science and mathematics, Berlin, Springer, 2016

Abstract

In this paper I shall consider two related avenues of argument that have been used to make the case for the inconsistency of mathematics: firstly, Gödel's paradox which leads to a contradiction within mathematics and, secondly, the incompatibility of completeness and consistency established by Gödel's incompleteness theorems. By bringing in considerations from the philosophy of mathematical practice on informal proofs, I suggest that we should add to the two axes of completeness and consistency a third axis of formality and informality. I use this perspective to respond to the arguments for the inconsistency of mathematics made by Beall and Priest, presenting problems with the assumptions needed concerning formalisation, the unity of informal mathematics and the relation between the formal and informal.

Cited authors

Gödel Kurt