karl bühler digital

Home > Journal > Journal Issue > Journal article

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 2009

Pages: 371-388

Series: Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences

Full citation:

Rasmus Thybo Jensen, "Motor intentionality and the case of Schneider", Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences 8 (3), 2009, pp. 371-388.

Abstract

I argue that Merleau-Ponty's use of the case of Schneider in his arguments for the existence of non-conconceptual and non-representational motor intentionality contains a problematic methodological ambiguity. Motor intentionality is both to be revealed by its perspicuous preservation and by its contrastive impairment in one and the same case. To resolve the resulting contradiction I suggest we emphasize the second of Merleau-Ponty's two lines of argument. I argue that this interpretation is the one in best accordance both with Merleau-Ponty's general methodology and with the empirical case of Schneider as it was described by Gelb and Goldstein.

Cited authors

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 2009

Pages: 371-388

Series: Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences

Full citation:

Rasmus Thybo Jensen, "Motor intentionality and the case of Schneider", Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences 8 (3), 2009, pp. 371-388.