
Publication details
Year: 2005
Pages: 515-548
Series: Synthese
Full citation:
, "Mind, brain, and epistemologically different worlds", Synthese 147 (3), 2005, pp. 515-548.


Mind, brain, and epistemologically different worlds
pp. 515-548
in: John Bickle (ed), Neuroscience and its philosophy, Synthese 147 (3), 2005.Abstract
The reason why, since Descartes, nobody has found a solution to the mind–body problem seems to be that the problem itself is a false or pseudo-problem. The discussion has proceeded within a pre-Cartesian conceptual framework which itself is a source of the difficulty. Dualism and all its alternatives have preserved the same pre-Cartesian conceptual framework even while denying Descartes’ dualism. In order to avoid this pseudo-problem, I introduce a new perspective with three elements: the subject, the observed object, and the conditions of observation (given by the internal and external tools of observation). On this new perspective, because of the conditions of observation, the mind and the brain belong to epistemologically different worlds.
Cited authors
Publication details
Year: 2005
Pages: 515-548
Series: Synthese
Full citation:
, "Mind, brain, and epistemologically different worlds", Synthese 147 (3), 2005, pp. 515-548.