karl bühler digital

Home > Journal > Journal Issue > Journal article

Publication details

Year: 2006

Pages: 343-353

Series: Synthese

Full citation:

Gualtiero Piccinini, "Computational explanation in neuroscience", Synthese 153 (3), 2006, pp. 343-353.

Abstract

According to some philosophers, computational explanation is proprietary to psychology—it does not belong in neuroscience. But neuroscientists routinely offer computational explanations of cognitive phenomena. In fact, computational explanation was initially imported from computability theory into the science of mind by neuroscientists, who justified this move on neurophysiological grounds. Establishing the legitimacy and importance of computational explanation in neuroscience is one thing; shedding light on it is another. I raise some philosophical questions pertaining to computational explanation and outline some promising answers that are being developed by a number of authors.

Publication details

Year: 2006

Pages: 343-353

Series: Synthese

Full citation:

Gualtiero Piccinini, "Computational explanation in neuroscience", Synthese 153 (3), 2006, pp. 343-353.