karl bühler digital

Home > Journal > Journal Issue > Journal article

Publication details

Year: 2012

Pages: 261-286

Series: Synthese

Full citation:

David Slutsky, "Confusion and dependence in uses of history", Synthese 184 (3), 2012, pp. 261-286.

Confusion and dependence in uses of history

David Slutsky

pp. 261-286

in: Synthese 184 (3), 2012.

Abstract

Many people argue that history makes a special difference to the subjects of biology and psychology, and that history does not make this special difference to other parts of the world. This paper will show that historical properties make no more or less of a difference to biology or psychology than to chemistry, physics, or other sciences. Although historical properties indeed make a certain kind of difference to biology and psychology, this paper will show that historical properties make the same kind of difference to geology, sociology, astronomy, and other sciences. Similarly, many people argue that nonhistorical properties make a special difference to the nonbiological and the nonpsychological world. This paper will show that nonhistorical properties make the same difference to all things in the world when it comes to their causal behavior and that historical properties make the same difference to all things in the world when it comes to their distributions. Although history is special, it is special in the same way to all parts of the world.

Publication details

Year: 2012

Pages: 261-286

Series: Synthese

Full citation:

David Slutsky, "Confusion and dependence in uses of history", Synthese 184 (3), 2012, pp. 261-286.